APOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Apogee Enterprises's net margin of 15.61%. Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 22.23% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

Apogee Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.1%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.71 which suggests that it could grow by 4.7%. Given that Apogee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Apogee Enterprises is more attractive than Fastenal.

Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.268%.

Apogee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Apogee Enterprises pays 21.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Apogee Enterprises's net income of $30.6M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, Apogee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 35.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apogee Enterprises is 0.92x versus 5.55x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Apogee Enterprises's net margin of 4.63%. Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 22.23% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

Apogee Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.1%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29%. Given that Apogee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, analysts believe Apogee Enterprises is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.617%.

Apogee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apogee Enterprises pays 21.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Apogee Enterprises's net income of $30.6M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Apogee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apogee Enterprises is 0.92x versus 1.04x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Apogee Enterprises's net margin of 8.14%. Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 22.23% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

Apogee Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.1%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Apogee Enterprises has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Apogee Enterprises is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

Apogee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apogee Enterprises pays 21.22% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. Apogee Enterprises's net income of $30.6M is lower than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Apogee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 22.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apogee Enterprises is 0.92x versus 1.60x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of 8.93% compared to Apogee Enterprises's net margin of -31.58%. Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 22.23% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97%.

Apogee Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.1%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.71%. Given that Apogee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Apogee Enterprises is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Apogee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apogee Enterprises pays 21.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $173.3M. Apogee Enterprises's net income of $30.6M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, Apogee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apogee Enterprises is 0.92x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.